Women Bishops

Women Bishops

47 posts
14 July 2014
profilepictures
Photographer
profilepictures
Someone's bored with his colouring in then?

Posted 19 July 2014
Rik_Richardson
Photographer
Rik_Richardson
I think they should be called "Bishes"....


Posted 19 July 2014
EdT
Photographer
EdT
Allinthemind
I think the current count of discrete Christian religions is over 30,000. One of them must be right!!!
I read that as discreet christian religions. I was going to ask how many indiscreet ones there are. But, must one of them be right? If they are all based on the same flawed premise that the son of God was born to a virgin, also born to a virgin (or is that bit only some of them), was crucified and arose from the dead, then surely they must all be wrong if that premise turns out tp be false. OK, looks like the bit about Mary being born to a virgin is not all Christian faiths, more of a catholic thing.
Posted 19 July 2014
Edited by EdT 19 July 2014
Allinthemind
Photographer
Allinthemind
EdT

I read that as discreet christian religions. I was going to ask how many indiscreet ones there are. But, must one of them be right? If they are all based on the same flawed premise that the son of God was born to a virgin, also born to a virgin (or is that bit only some of them), was crucified and arose from the dead, then surely they must all be wrong if that premise turns out tp be false. OK, looks like the bit about Mary being born to a virgin is not all Christian faiths, more of a catholic thing.



Maybe my irony wasn't blatant enough  In other words if 29,999 aren't "true"....
Posted 19 July 2014
Jackass
Photographer
Jackass
Most religions have always changed with the times, it's nothing new. Catholics don't burn Protestants for transubstantiation anymore and Protestants have stopped burning witches - all in the name of a loving God for God's sake! Islam being the exception in that it's stuck firmly in the Middle Ages.

If they didn't change for the times they'd lose support - pretty much as they are doing. I look forward to the day when their inconsequential arguments are no longer deemed newsworthy and the majority of the population can get some peace and quiet.

Richard Dawkins for Pope, get some common sense in there.

Posted 19 July 2014
redbaron
Photographer
redbaron
Jackass

Most religions have always changed with the times, it's nothing new. Catholics don't burn Protestants for transubstantiation anymore and Protestants have stopped burning witches - all in the name of a loving God for God's sake! Islam being the exception in that it's stuck firmly in the Middle Ages. If they didn't change for the times they'd lose support - pretty much as they are doing. I look forward to the day when their inconsequential arguments are no longer deemed newsworthy and the majority of the population can get some peace and quiet. Richard Dawkins for Pope, get some common sense in there.


Only that cannot be if you believe your version of christianity is 'The' religion.

The whole point with any religion is that it at least purports to represent the ultimate truth, the purpose of creation, the rules by which the creator himself asserts we must live our lives if we are to have any hope of salvation. To accept that as the case precludes the option of change. It is not in the remit of mortal man to decide, 'you know what that rule is jolly inconvenient, lets revise it to something that suits us better.' If the rules don't happen to suit the lifestyle you live then it follows it is your lifestyle that is wrong not the laws of your god. It may suck. It may mean a lifetime of misery and pennance to ensure you are fit to enter those pearly gates but that is what you have to accept and seek to achieve. Simply ripping out huge chunks of the testaments and throwing them away because they do not suit you is not an option you are entitled to have.

Unfortunately you also shoot down your own arguement by mentioning Islam. As you say much of it is stuck in the middle ages. Only it is not losing support as you suggest through not changing.  Disproving your own assertion.



Posted 19 July 2014
Jackass
Photographer
Jackass
Actually my assertion is that ALL religion is rubbish.

Historically, religions have adapted to the times, that's indisputable because the religions of a few hundred years ago bear little resemblance to those of today. Like everything else in the universe they evolve. Evolution itself is a proven fact beyond all doubt to those who view the evidence objectively, believers of all persuasions don't.

As for Islam, it's going through the same phase as Christianity did 400/500 years ago before it collapsed, spreading by force not choice. It cannot last, as Christianity couldn't, and it will go the same way but a lot quicker as science and FACT is more than ever filling the gap that religion once filled.

And it can't come quick enough as ALL religions are fundamentally evil.

Posted 20 July 2014
CCP
Photographer
CCP
Jackass

Actually my assertion is that ALL religion is rubbish. Historically, religions have adapted to the times, that's indisputable because the religions of a few hundred years ago bear little resemblance to those of today. Like everything else in the universe they evolve. Evolution itself is a proven fact beyond all doubt to those who view the evidence objectively, believers of all persuasions don't. As for Islam, it's going through the same phase as Christianity did 400/500 years ago before it collapsed, spreading by force not choice. It cannot last, as Christianity couldn't, and it will go the same way but a lot quicker as science and FACT is more than ever filling the gap that religion once filled. And it can't come quick enough as ALL religions are fundamentally evil.


Totally agree. I saw the programme on the tv last week about faith schools. Shocking. Kids are being told that evolution is a lie, and all sorts of nonsense like they now have scientific proof that God exists. It is outrageous, really disturbing. To teach kids such nonsense is like a form of child abuse to me. I have quite a few arguments when I visit relatives, as one of them is a creationist. He actually thinks that scientists are liars. What the hell would any scientist want to lie for? Science is about finding out the truth obviously. He'd rather believe in a fairy story about an imaginary friend, than face historical facts.
Posted 20 July 2014
tonycsm
Photographer
tonycsm
If I turned around and said I believe in fairies, then people would evaluate me as insane even if they believed in a god or not and yet if I said I believed in a god, I would be generally accepted by both sides.
The truth is I have just as much chance of proving fairies exist as I have of a god existing, yet one is acceptable but the other isn't in our society!
Posted 20 July 2014
pentax5AC
Photographer
pentax5AC
So there we have it then...all religion is rubbish, evil and equates to a belief in fairies.

That will be the reason no doubt then, why 2 billion Christians, that's a third of the global population, profess a belief in God, and the rest continue to worship him via alternative faiths.

I think your argument is over simplistic and condescendingly dismissive of what faith is all about.
But at least we now know, thanks to science, how "insane" all those people are, and how imperative it is that they contact you soon for enlightenment! What was your name again...ah "Jackass"



Posted 20 July 2014
Jackass
Photographer
Jackass
The immediate response to reasoned argument is ridicule, typical of "believers". Professing a belief and believing isn't the same thing. If anyone's a jackass it those who believe that a living loving god would tolerate the antics that ALL religions have got up to over the years. Murder, torture and child molestation to name but three.

Without blind faith it's impossible to believe in any God without one single shred of hard evidence to substantiate it. But show these people hard evidence that the bible is utterly wrong on creation and it's "La la la, I can't hear you," time. Hardly anything from the bible appears in independent historical writings, "la la la I can't hear you," time. Rock solid proof that ALL creatures on the earth share a common ancestry, "La la la, I can't hear you," time. I could go on but I have better things to do.

I call myself Jackass for personal reasons, what's your excuse?

Posted 20 July 2014
Allinthemind
Photographer
Allinthemind
pentax5AC

So there we have it then...all religion is rubbish, evil and equates to a belief in fairies. That will be the reason no doubt then, why 2 billion Christians, that's a third of the global population, profess a belief in God, and the rest continue to worship him via alternative faiths. I think your argument is over simplistic and condescendingly dismissive of what faith is all about. But at least we now know, thanks to science, how "insane" all those people are, and how imperative it is that they contact you soon for enlightenment! What was your name again...ah "Jackass"


Having a belief in a higher being/power and following the doctrines of a religion are very different things. Religions are born from the inbuilt need to cope with the lack of ability to explain what we don't understand (else we'd go mad); which is a solid biological-evoloutinary reason. As we progress our knowledge, as a socirty, we can chip away at or hold on to the things we once believed (created).  That is partly wht there are so many different versions of christianity. Some of them are young Earth creationists, believing that the Earth was created by a higher power less than 10,000 years ago. There is a mountain of evidence that says this isn't the case. Even the senior members of the Catholic and Anglican churches agree about young Earth creationists being deluded.
What I find disturbing, isn't the natural reasons for wanting to believe in higher powers (even though there is no need to or no evidence of any), it's the following of doctrine to the point of murdering our fellow man, harming our children etc etc. Perhaps even worse is that many religious people seem to be anti-science because science dares ro show that they may be wrong in their beliefs which can lead to this ridiculous state of affaits where some religious fools want to teach creationism in the classroom as a valid alternative to evoloution! Perhaps we should also teach the flat-Earth theory, the Earth-centric solar system theory and the Stork Theoty ocf childbirth, they are all as equally ridiculous.

Si
Posted 21 July 2014
tonycsm
Photographer
tonycsm
The really good thing about religion is that it gives people hope in a world torn apart by....... religion!sad
Posted 21 July 2014
Edited by tonycsm 21 July 2014
Bill_M
Photographer
Bill_M
EdT
OK, looks like the bit about Mary being born to a virgin is not all Christian faiths, more of a catholic thing.
No, Catholics do not believe that and never have.
Posted 24 July 2014
EdT
Photographer
EdT
Bill_M
No, Catholics do not believe that and never have.
Sorry, I have a problem getting my head around the difference between "Immaculate conception" and "Virginal conception". So, if I understand correctly, Mary was born as a result of Immaculate Conception, but Jesus was born as a result of Virginal Conception. So, now the question as to how it came to be immaculate.
Posted 25 July 2014
To reply to this thread you must be a member. Click here to join