 | 22 May 2012 17:48 |
|
| ShootonLocation Photographer  Location United Kingdom West Midlands UK Professional Photographer | The company, that is If no buyer, then apossible stock market floatation What is it worth?  |
|
| .. it is what you leave out of the photograph that makes the picture | ||
 | 23 May 2012 00:32 |
| paulford Photographer  Location United Kingdom South Yorkshire Doncaster | My best guess would be about the same a facebook. |
| 23 May 2012 02:19 |
|
| Morgan_L Photographer  Location United Kingdom Hampshire Havant |  Quote from paulfordMy best guess would be about the same a facebook. Which is getting cheaper by the day  . |
|
| Partially sighted, coloured blind, Light sensitive & short sighted Photographer, Howdy :). | ||
| 30 May 2012 12:47 |
|
| PB001 Photographer  Location United Kingdom County Durham Peterlee | It's only worth what some rich dude is willing to pay for it because if they float it whoever gets 51% of the shares owns it. | |
| I’m a Pro commercial portrait photographer from the East Coast of Durham; I'm seriously crazy about photography, have been for a thousand years! I joined here to experience the dark side *smile* | ||
| 30 May 2012 14:25 |
| Photoflash Photographer Location United Kingdom Hertfordshire Watford | Its probably for sale because its not doing well, there are many sources of royalty free images, why pay high prices? |
| 30 May 2012 14:51 |
| photomane9 Photographer  Location United Kingdom London Bexleyheath | Quote from Photoflash Its probably for sale because its not doing well, there are many sources of royalty free images, why pay high prices? I suspect that what you wrote was not what you actually meant. Getty, of course, deal in royalty free images because that is one of the main types of licence available from stock libraries. Royalty free does not mean 'free', it means you pay a fixed fee for a specific usage, and nothing else. |
|
