  | 20 April 2012 12:08 |
| BustyBritain Photographer Location United Kingdom North Yorkshire | Would it be possible to add implied nude on the work types? Lots of girls are adding nude to their profile pages but don't actually work to that level. |
 | 20 April 2012 13:37 |
|
| gerryquiff Photographer  Location United Kingdom Lanarkshire Bonnie Scotland | Models normally tick higher levels, but fail to explain that they'll only work to these levels with certain photographers. Which I have no problem with. |
|
| CAT WANTED. Must be large enough to make Davy Crockett hat. (6 7/8) Prefer ginger | ||
20 April 2012 17:25 |
|
| mgphotomedia Photographer | Implied nude was removed from the list of levels some time ago due to the confusion it was causing. Nude is nude and topless is topless - simples [most of the time]. Implied nude has no commonly accepted definition and is open to wide interpretation. I'd be surprised if PS management consider adding it back for even a nanosecond. |
 | 20 April 2012 17:42 |
| WebModerator Location United Kingdom West Sussex Brighton |
The contradictory and misleading term Implied Nude was indeed removed a few years ago
as it was found impossible to achieve concensus as to what the term actually means. There is little chance of it being reintroduced. |
| 16 Users currently online | Blue=Models Orange=Photographers Red=Agencies Purple=MUA/Stylists Grey=Studios Green=Moderators | |
| bonni_cuffs hollyrose OlgaCabaeva | ||
| 63jian antoinewynn cliffc Dod1904 fitzkoraldo Funder005 Ladiesman minolta ownimage psn redbaron rembrandt rod_m99 | ||
